top of page

Alec Baldwin To Be Charged In Deadly ‘Rust’ Shooting. Analysis w/ NY Attorney David Schwartz -WABC 7

Alec Baldwin To Be Charged In Deadly ‘Rust’ Shooting. Analysis w/ NY Attorney David Schwartz -WABC 7

0:03
of this news earlier today that actor
0:05
Alec Baldwin will be charged for that
0:07
deadly shooting on the set of his movie
0:08
rust now sadly this is nowhere near the
0:11
first time somebody has lost their life
0:13
on a movie set here in the U.S since
0:15
1990 it's happened at least 43 times and
0:18
on top of that more than 150 people have
0:20
suffered life-altering injuries while
0:23
filming but far more rare are there
0:26
circumstances we're talking about right
0:27
now with charges as serious as
0:29
involuntary manslaughter the nature of
0:32
that crime varies from state to state
0:33
Although our investigative reporter
0:35
Kristen Thorne sat down with defense
0:37
attorney and legal expert David Schwartz
0:39
earlier today to better understand
0:40
exactly what we're talking about with
0:41
the magnitude of the charges
0:44
first I want to get your reaction to
0:47
this charge today the news of this
0:48
charge
0:51
well I'm
0:52
entirely surprised the
0:55
the fact-based charge and and there was
0:57
a long investigation and I think the
1:01
prosecutors could have gone either way
1:03
they could have not charged Alec Baldwin
1:05
but they also had enough negligence in
1:09
this case and that's the standard is a
1:11
negligent standard where they where they
1:14
created a high enough bar to bring
1:18
criminal charges let's explain to people
1:20
what involuntary manslaughter is I'm
1:24
familiar with that because of what I do
1:25
you're familiar with that what does that
1:28
mean
1:29
sure you know in New York it's it's
1:31
different than New Mexico so in New
1:33
Mexico
1:34
the theory is where there's a lawful
1:37
activity going on at that time but there
1:40
was negligence involved with the
1:42
activity meaning that a reasonable
1:45
person would not have acted the way Alec
1:48
Baldwin did a reasonable person would
1:50
have taken other precautions before
1:53
firing the weapon so
1:55
um you know so it's a different standard
1:58
so it's that reasonable person's
2:00
standard and the fact that he was
2:02
handling a gun involves an enhancement
2:05
so the enhancement uh brings it up to a
2:09
potential of five years in jail the
2:11
regular involuntary manslaughter charge
2:14
is a year and a half speaking of jail
2:18
prison time do you think he's going to
2:19
do any
2:21
I don't think so if he does do jail time
2:23
it'll be minimal jail time uh either
2:26
this case is going to have a disposition
2:29
where there's a plea bargain and Alec
2:32
Baldwin will have to plead guilty to a
2:34
crime and and then that would involve
2:37
probably little to no jail or he's going
2:40
to go to trial and face the maximum of
2:43
five years in jail we'll see what
2:45
happens if he goes to trial it'll be one
2:47
of those Blockbuster trials that's for
2:49
sure but there's a good chance that this
2:51
case could settle uh before that point
2:54
his attorney called this a quote
2:57
terrible miscarriage of Justice what do
2:59
you think
3:00
if I were his attorney I would say the
3:03
same exact thing I think Alec Baldwin
3:05
has a lot of arguments I think Alec
3:07
Baldwin has the argument that this is
3:09
just a horrible horrible accident that
3:12
took place but there was no negligence
3:14
on his part and if there was no
3:16
negligence on his part why should he be
3:18
charged he's claiming that he had no
3:21
idea and would have no idea that there
3:24
could be live ammunition in that gun as
3:27
opposed to the prosecutors are saying
3:29
wait a second you should have known that
3:32
this was a dangerous situation there was
3:34
a danger involved in this whole episode
3:37
there was negligence throughout there
3:39
was cutting of corners and they feel
3:42
they have enough evidence to show that
3:44
Alec Baldwin was negligent so his
3:48
attorney is going to argue look this is
3:50
a civil case not a criminal case and the
3:52
civil case was already
3:54
um uh you know the civil case uh has had
3:58
a disposition already
4:00
what do you think one thing that's
4:03
bothered me I don't know if it's
4:04
bothered you is how did that bullet end
4:07
up in that gun in the first place
4:09
doesn't that seem to be kind of really
4:12
an issue here
4:13
it's a huge issue and the prosecutors
4:17
need to explain that issue because you
4:19
would think if they had a person that
4:23
actually put the live round in that gun
4:25
well aren't we talking a little bit more
4:27
about voluntary manslaughter and maybe
4:29
even murder aren't we talking about that
4:31
if somebody takes a gun that's going to
4:34
be used on a set and instead of putting
4:36
blanks in knowingly puts in live
4:38
ammunition I think we're more on the
4:40
murder realm so it leads me to believe
4:42
that they don't have that that the
4:45
prosecutors have not figured out how
4:47
that live rounds got into that gun and
4:50
if it goes to trial I don't think it
4:52
will either but if it does that will
4:54
obviously be a huge discussion
4:58
absolutely I mean if you're the defense
5:01
attorney just saying you know where
5:03
where's the proof like who put this live
5:06
live live bullet in this gun certainly
5:09
Alec Baldwin did not because he's not
5:12
being charged with that so you know I I
5:15
think the prosecutors have a lot of
5:17
barriers to overcome in this case I
5:19
think the defense does have a viable
5:21
case but so does the prosecution it's
5:24
one of those close calls which makes
5:26
this case a very interesting case and
5:28
it's very fact specific and it could be
5:31
based on many different nuances that we
5:33
don't know about right now yeah because
5:35
if it goes to trial that is not going to
5:37
be a good look for law enforcement and
5:39
prosecutors here that they have not been
5:41
able to pinpoint who did that because
5:43
the really lucky person here is whoever
5:46
put that bullet in that gun it didn't do
5:48
it by itself it didn't walk into the
5:51
chamber and into the gun someone did it
5:53
and I am still very curious and and
5:56
think that person needs to be held
5:58
account as well
5:59
Kristen that sounded like an opening
6:01
statement right there a hundred percent
6:03
a hundred percent that that is what the
6:06
defense is going to argue but we don't
6:08
know what's happening right now right is
6:11
the investigation over who knows Kristen
6:13
we may see somebody charged with putting
6:16
that bullet in the chamber so we don't
6:18
know what's about to come next but I'm
6:20
led to believe at least by these charges
6:23
today that they don't have that person
6:25
and they're they're going strictly on a
6:29
negligence standard as it goes to Alec
6:31
Baldwin what he should have known did he
6:34
act like a reasonable person did he
6:37
exercise the reasonable amount of care
6:39
that he should have in that situation
6:41
when handling a gun
6:44
if you were his attorney right now or
6:46
maybe you can give us some insight what
6:48
are they talking about right now
6:50
well first they're talking about
6:51
shutting him up okay he can't do any
6:53
more interviews he can't go out in the
6:55
Press he needs to stop talking because
6:59
everything he says could be used against
7:01
them at this point and before this point
7:04
so that's the first thing the second
7:07
thing is they're trying to get as much
7:09
information from him as possible but I'm
7:11
sure they have their own team of
7:12
investigators right now who are
7:15
conducting uh their own interviews their
7:17
own analysis and their own investigation
7:20
so their own investigation could come up
7:23
big in this case as well
7:25
well thank you so much I hope you'll
7:27
stay in touch with us we know that this
7:29
is the charges are formally you know are
7:31
going to be announced later this month
7:33
and so we know that this will still be
7:35
be going on so thank you so much for
7:37
being with us
7:38
thank you Kristen
7:40
coming up next on the Eyewitness News
7:42
countdown uh discussion about what is on
7:44
the line when it comes to raising the
7:45
federal debt limit in the United States
7:49
[Music]
7:50
welcome back to the Eyewitness News
7:52
Countdown the U.S has now hit its debt
7:54
ceiling and that means the clock is now
7:55
ticking on Congress to prevent a
7:57
financial

IMG_7307.PSD.png
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Gotham Government Relations

546 5th Avenue

6th Floor

New York, NY 10036

(212) 641-0499

bottom of page